The Human Genome Project:
A Cosmic Joke that has the Scientists Rolling in the Aisle
Bruce H. Lipton, PhD
Stanford University’s School of Medicine
Stanford University’s School of Medicine
"One of the most important and fundamental core beliefs in conventional biology is that the traits and character of organisms are “controlled” by their genes.
Scientists have continuously touted that our biological fates are written in our genes. In the face of that belief, the Universe humors us with a cosmic joke: The “control” of life is not in the genes.
Emerging at the cutting edge of cell science is the recognition that the environment, and more specifically, our perception of the environment, directly controls our behavior and gene activity.
The environment, through the act of perception, controls behavior, gene activity and even the rewriting of the genetic code. Cells “learn” (evolve) by creating new perception proteins in response to novel environmental experiences.
“Learned” perceptions, especially those derived from indirect experiences (e.g., parental, peer and academic education), may be based upon incorrect information or faulty interpretations. Since they may or may not be “true,” perceptions are in reality-beliefs!
Our new scientific knowledge is returning to an ancient awareness of the power of belief. Beliefs are indeed powerful…whether they are true or false. While we have always heard of the “power of positive thinking,” the problem is negative thinking is just as powerful, though in the “opposite” direction.
An understanding of the newly described cell-control mechanisms will cause as profound a shift in biological belief as the quantum revolution caused in physics.
Continue Reading - Click Here
Scientists have continuously touted that our biological fates are written in our genes. In the face of that belief, the Universe humors us with a cosmic joke: The “control” of life is not in the genes.
Emerging at the cutting edge of cell science is the recognition that the environment, and more specifically, our perception of the environment, directly controls our behavior and gene activity.
The environment, through the act of perception, controls behavior, gene activity and even the rewriting of the genetic code. Cells “learn” (evolve) by creating new perception proteins in response to novel environmental experiences.
“Learned” perceptions, especially those derived from indirect experiences (e.g., parental, peer and academic education), may be based upon incorrect information or faulty interpretations. Since they may or may not be “true,” perceptions are in reality-beliefs!
Our new scientific knowledge is returning to an ancient awareness of the power of belief. Beliefs are indeed powerful…whether they are true or false. While we have always heard of the “power of positive thinking,” the problem is negative thinking is just as powerful, though in the “opposite” direction.
An understanding of the newly described cell-control mechanisms will cause as profound a shift in biological belief as the quantum revolution caused in physics.
Continue Reading - Click Here
Understanding Brainwaves to Expand our Consciousness
The human brain is a complex entity constantly at work, sending electrical signals, communicating, building new neural connections and so on. This electrical activity generated by the brain, also known as brainwaves, reflect our state of mind. Reality is not based on outside influences but is an internal process based on our thoughts, perception and emotions. If we deepen our understanding of these brainwave frequencies, we can control our reality.
There are five different kinds of brainwaves – Beta, Alpha, Theta, Delta and Gamma
It is completely a natural biological occurrence in every human being to experience these different states at various times in a day, and generally one state is dominant.
Did you know that each brainwave has its own set of characteristics representing a unique state of consciousness? Each brainwave state occur in a specific frequency range measured in cycles per second (Hz).
Each type of brainwave played a critical role in our mental development during our childhood. And today, they play an important role in maintaining our health and vitality as adults. Lets take a look at the different brain wave states and the associated benefits and experiences –
There are five different kinds of brainwaves – Beta, Alpha, Theta, Delta and Gamma
It is completely a natural biological occurrence in every human being to experience these different states at various times in a day, and generally one state is dominant.
Did you know that each brainwave has its own set of characteristics representing a unique state of consciousness? Each brainwave state occur in a specific frequency range measured in cycles per second (Hz).
Each type of brainwave played a critical role in our mental development during our childhood. And today, they play an important role in maintaining our health and vitality as adults. Lets take a look at the different brain wave states and the associated benefits and experiences –
Beta (12 to 30 Hz)
Beta are the brainwaves of our normal waking consciousness. It is associated with a heightened state of alertness, logical thinking, problem-solving ability, concentration, when the mind is actively engaged in mental activities. Like a person in active conversation, playing sports or making a presentation would be in a Beta state. But higher Beta levels also result into stress, anxiety and restlessness.
Most people spend their waking lives in a beta state, no wonder many people experience high stress levels in today’s world. At the same time Beta is required for effective functioning in daily life.
Continue Reading - Click Here
Beta are the brainwaves of our normal waking consciousness. It is associated with a heightened state of alertness, logical thinking, problem-solving ability, concentration, when the mind is actively engaged in mental activities. Like a person in active conversation, playing sports or making a presentation would be in a Beta state. But higher Beta levels also result into stress, anxiety and restlessness.
Most people spend their waking lives in a beta state, no wonder many people experience high stress levels in today’s world. At the same time Beta is required for effective functioning in daily life.
Continue Reading - Click Here
A NASA Physicist’s Take On Consciousness And Free Will
Tom Campbell
NASA Physicist and Consciousness Expert
NASA Physicist and Consciousness Expert
The consciousness system has free will -- free will is necessary for consciousness. Consciousness creates the structure. The structure defines the reality, and the reality creates the possibility for an interactive experience between subsets of consciousness.
The quality of the subset of consciousness (as specified by its history) and the structural bounds defining the reality together determine the available decision space and the nature of possible interactions. Some examples of virtual realities from our point of view: PMRs, dreams, where you end up after dying in a PMR, OOBE (Out of Body Experience) "locales", NPMR (Nonphysical-Matter Reality) in general.
The historical record of these subsets or entities grows or evolves as choices are made and their intent is expressed. What is gained by a subset of consciousness (either Ramon or his IUOC (Individuated Unit Of Consciousness)) participating in a virtual reality is a new historical record that (thinking positively) accumulates quality (reduces entropy) as it engages in exercising its freewill intent.
From the historical database, the LCS (Larger Consciousness System) selects a historical individual, letscall him "Ramon", or a sequence of historical characters that have progressed through multiple lifetimes,
Ramon participates in this PMR virtual reality as a manifestation of his IUOC, and as such he brings with him all the quality and history that his IUOC has to offer at the time. He is, in more technical terms, a specific instance of his IUOC that is restricted to abide by the PMR rule-set. As Ramon experiences and chooses in PMR, his IUOC collects the data and integrates it in real time.
To this point we have used language that implies that Ramon and his IUOC are two different entities. Assuming that Ramon is a subset of his IUOC, both he and his IUOC could each be considered individual subsets of consciousness with a history and could be “bubbled up” or be chosen by the LCS to engage in a virtual reality appropriate to their evolutionary needs.
He is, in more technical terms, a specific instance of his IUOC that is restricted to abide by the PMR rule-set. As Ramon experiences and chooses in PMR, his IUOC collects the data and integrates it in real time.
) If that IOUC is simply collecting data to be processed by the LCS, it is no more than a history file in the process of having data uploaded to it.
2) If that IOUC is making freewill decisions and choices within one or more virtual realties that subsume PMR then it has two or more tracks of evolution running at the same time that may influence each other. For example, two separate experience packets in PMR at the same time (that may or may not interact) plus the IUOC actively interacting acting with one or each of them would constitute three tracks of evolution running at the same time.
3) If that IOUC is making freewill decisions and choices within one or more virtual realties that are independent of PMR then it has two or more tracks of evolution running at the same time that do not directly interact or influence each other.
The bottom line is that there is no fixed one answer to how the IUOC relates to the individual PMR character – the system is intelligent, aware, and flexible enough to optimize the huge array of possible choices and processes always available within a large complex digital information system.
We humans don’t like uncertainty – we tend to develop closed solutions for every problem – its simpler that way. People need metaphors they can easily grasp and feel comfortable with – as we grow our understanding, our metaphors change.
Continue Reading - Click Here
The quality of the subset of consciousness (as specified by its history) and the structural bounds defining the reality together determine the available decision space and the nature of possible interactions. Some examples of virtual realities from our point of view: PMRs, dreams, where you end up after dying in a PMR, OOBE (Out of Body Experience) "locales", NPMR (Nonphysical-Matter Reality) in general.
The historical record of these subsets or entities grows or evolves as choices are made and their intent is expressed. What is gained by a subset of consciousness (either Ramon or his IUOC (Individuated Unit Of Consciousness)) participating in a virtual reality is a new historical record that (thinking positively) accumulates quality (reduces entropy) as it engages in exercising its freewill intent.
From the historical database, the LCS (Larger Consciousness System) selects a historical individual, letscall him "Ramon", or a sequence of historical characters that have progressed through multiple lifetimes,
Ramon participates in this PMR virtual reality as a manifestation of his IUOC, and as such he brings with him all the quality and history that his IUOC has to offer at the time. He is, in more technical terms, a specific instance of his IUOC that is restricted to abide by the PMR rule-set. As Ramon experiences and chooses in PMR, his IUOC collects the data and integrates it in real time.
To this point we have used language that implies that Ramon and his IUOC are two different entities. Assuming that Ramon is a subset of his IUOC, both he and his IUOC could each be considered individual subsets of consciousness with a history and could be “bubbled up” or be chosen by the LCS to engage in a virtual reality appropriate to their evolutionary needs.
He is, in more technical terms, a specific instance of his IUOC that is restricted to abide by the PMR rule-set. As Ramon experiences and chooses in PMR, his IUOC collects the data and integrates it in real time.
) If that IOUC is simply collecting data to be processed by the LCS, it is no more than a history file in the process of having data uploaded to it.
2) If that IOUC is making freewill decisions and choices within one or more virtual realties that subsume PMR then it has two or more tracks of evolution running at the same time that may influence each other. For example, two separate experience packets in PMR at the same time (that may or may not interact) plus the IUOC actively interacting acting with one or each of them would constitute three tracks of evolution running at the same time.
3) If that IOUC is making freewill decisions and choices within one or more virtual realties that are independent of PMR then it has two or more tracks of evolution running at the same time that do not directly interact or influence each other.
The bottom line is that there is no fixed one answer to how the IUOC relates to the individual PMR character – the system is intelligent, aware, and flexible enough to optimize the huge array of possible choices and processes always available within a large complex digital information system.
We humans don’t like uncertainty – we tend to develop closed solutions for every problem – its simpler that way. People need metaphors they can easily grasp and feel comfortable with – as we grow our understanding, our metaphors change.
Continue Reading - Click Here
Insight Into Cellular Consciousness
Bruce H. Lipton, PhD
Stanford University’s School of Medicine
Stanford University’s School of Medicine
"The primacy of DNA in influencing and regulating biological behavior and evolution is based upon an unfounded assumption. A seminal article by H. F. Nijhout (BioEssays 1990, 12 (9):441-446) describes how concepts concerning genetic “controls” and “programs” were originally conceived as metaphors to help define and direct avenues of research.
The notion that the nucleus and its genes are the “brain” of the cell is an untenable and illogical hypothesis. If the nucleus truly represented the brain of the cell, then removal of the nucleus would result in the cessation of cell functions and immediate cell death.
However, experimentally enucleated cells may survive for two or more months with out genes, and yet are capable of effecting complex responses to environmental and cytoplasmic stimuli
Studies on cloned human cells led me to the awareness that the cell’s plasmalemma, commonly referred to as the cell membrane, represents the cell’s “brain.” Cell membranes, the first biological organelle to appear in evolution, are the only organelle common to every living organism.
For most of the last fifty years, the membrane was perceived as a “passive,” semi-permeable barrier, resembling a breathable “plastic wrap,” whose function was to simply contain the cytoplasm.
Membrane IMPs can be functionally subdivided into two classes: receptors and effectors. Receptors are input devices that respond to environmental signals. Effectors are output devices that activate cellular processes
Receptors are molecular “antennas” that recognize environmental signals. Some receptor antennas extend inward from the membrane’s cytoplasmic face. These receptors “read” the internal milieu and provide awareness of cytoplasmic conditions. Other receptors extending from the cell’s outer surface provide awareness of external environmental signals.
Putting all the pieces together we are provide with insight as to how the cell’s “brain” processes information and elicits behavior.
The cell membrane is an organic information processor. It senses the environment and converts that awareness into “information” that can influence the activity of protein pathways and control the expression of the genes."
Continue Reading - Click Here
The notion that the nucleus and its genes are the “brain” of the cell is an untenable and illogical hypothesis. If the nucleus truly represented the brain of the cell, then removal of the nucleus would result in the cessation of cell functions and immediate cell death.
However, experimentally enucleated cells may survive for two or more months with out genes, and yet are capable of effecting complex responses to environmental and cytoplasmic stimuli
Studies on cloned human cells led me to the awareness that the cell’s plasmalemma, commonly referred to as the cell membrane, represents the cell’s “brain.” Cell membranes, the first biological organelle to appear in evolution, are the only organelle common to every living organism.
For most of the last fifty years, the membrane was perceived as a “passive,” semi-permeable barrier, resembling a breathable “plastic wrap,” whose function was to simply contain the cytoplasm.
Membrane IMPs can be functionally subdivided into two classes: receptors and effectors. Receptors are input devices that respond to environmental signals. Effectors are output devices that activate cellular processes
Receptors are molecular “antennas” that recognize environmental signals. Some receptor antennas extend inward from the membrane’s cytoplasmic face. These receptors “read” the internal milieu and provide awareness of cytoplasmic conditions. Other receptors extending from the cell’s outer surface provide awareness of external environmental signals.
Putting all the pieces together we are provide with insight as to how the cell’s “brain” processes information and elicits behavior.
The cell membrane is an organic information processor. It senses the environment and converts that awareness into “information” that can influence the activity of protein pathways and control the expression of the genes."
Continue Reading - Click Here
Fractal Evolution
Bruce H. Lipton, PhD
Stanford University’s School of Medicine
Stanford University’s School of Medicine
Evolution by BITs and Pieces: An Introduction to Fractal Evolution
"The membrane boundary enveloping each biological cell comprises the structural basis of a biological processor system (see article: Cellular Consciousness). As a processor, the cell’s membrane receptors scan the environment for signals.
The cell’s ability to selectively filter useful information out of “chaotic” noise resembles the function of Fourier transformations [mathematical filtering processes which find signals within what appears to be noise] on complex inputs to perceive specific frequencies as informational signals.
While the environment is in a sense “chaotic,” with hundreds and thousands of simultaneously-expressed “signals,” the cell can selectively read only those signals that are relevant to its existence."
Based upon the functional and structural features of the cell membrane, each single cell (e.g., amoeba) represents a self-powered microcomputer system. As in digital computers, the power or information handling capacity of the “cellular” computer is determined by the number of its BITs it can manage.
The IMP molecules comprising the cell’s BITs have defined physical parameters and therefore can be “measured.” The dimension of the IMP proteins is approximately the same as the thickness of the membrane. Since the IMPs, by definition, reside within the membrane’s bilayer, the proteins can only be arranged as a monolayer (meaning theIMPs can not be stacked upon one another).
Consequently the computing power of a cell is physically determined by limitations imposed on cellular dimensions. The inability to expand its membrane (i.e., surface area) limits the bacterium’s ability to acquire new perceptions (awareness).
Bacterial communities evolved a means to increase their survival by deploying an polysaccharide extracellular matrix to envelope all of the cells in the community and “protect” them from the ravages of the wild environment.
In computers, the “power” of the machine is measured in BIT handling capacities. In biological organisms, the “awareness” potential is reflected in the number and variety of integrated IMP complexes.Since the quantity ofIMPs is directly linked to “surface area,” awareness becomes a factor of shared membrane surfaces in the multicellular organisms.
Since the quantity of IMPs is directly linked to “surface area,” awareness becomes a factor of shared membrane surfaces in the multicellular organisms. It is proposed that similar to unicellular protozoans, human beings represent another evolutionary endpoint, the highest level of development for a multicellular biological structure.
Humans, as receptors and effectors, assemble and integrate into patterned networks (community) in the Earth’s envelope wherein they receive environmental “signals” and serve as switching mechanisms of the planet’s membrane gates.
A structural characteristic of fractals is relatively simple to understand: fractals exhibit a reiterated pattern of “structures” nested within one another. Each smaller structure is a miniature, but not necessarily an exact version of the larger form.
Therefore, while the structure of humans is a self-similar image of their own cells, the structure of human civilization would represent a self-similar structure of its component humans! Humans are a fractal image of society, cells are a fractal image of the human. In fact, cells are a fractal image of society as well.
Continue Reading - Click Here
The cell’s ability to selectively filter useful information out of “chaotic” noise resembles the function of Fourier transformations [mathematical filtering processes which find signals within what appears to be noise] on complex inputs to perceive specific frequencies as informational signals.
While the environment is in a sense “chaotic,” with hundreds and thousands of simultaneously-expressed “signals,” the cell can selectively read only those signals that are relevant to its existence."
Based upon the functional and structural features of the cell membrane, each single cell (e.g., amoeba) represents a self-powered microcomputer system. As in digital computers, the power or information handling capacity of the “cellular” computer is determined by the number of its BITs it can manage.
The IMP molecules comprising the cell’s BITs have defined physical parameters and therefore can be “measured.” The dimension of the IMP proteins is approximately the same as the thickness of the membrane. Since the IMPs, by definition, reside within the membrane’s bilayer, the proteins can only be arranged as a monolayer (meaning theIMPs can not be stacked upon one another).
Consequently the computing power of a cell is physically determined by limitations imposed on cellular dimensions. The inability to expand its membrane (i.e., surface area) limits the bacterium’s ability to acquire new perceptions (awareness).
Bacterial communities evolved a means to increase their survival by deploying an polysaccharide extracellular matrix to envelope all of the cells in the community and “protect” them from the ravages of the wild environment.
In computers, the “power” of the machine is measured in BIT handling capacities. In biological organisms, the “awareness” potential is reflected in the number and variety of integrated IMP complexes.Since the quantity ofIMPs is directly linked to “surface area,” awareness becomes a factor of shared membrane surfaces in the multicellular organisms.
Since the quantity of IMPs is directly linked to “surface area,” awareness becomes a factor of shared membrane surfaces in the multicellular organisms. It is proposed that similar to unicellular protozoans, human beings represent another evolutionary endpoint, the highest level of development for a multicellular biological structure.
Humans, as receptors and effectors, assemble and integrate into patterned networks (community) in the Earth’s envelope wherein they receive environmental “signals” and serve as switching mechanisms of the planet’s membrane gates.
A structural characteristic of fractals is relatively simple to understand: fractals exhibit a reiterated pattern of “structures” nested within one another. Each smaller structure is a miniature, but not necessarily an exact version of the larger form.
Therefore, while the structure of humans is a self-similar image of their own cells, the structure of human civilization would represent a self-similar structure of its component humans! Humans are a fractal image of society, cells are a fractal image of the human. In fact, cells are a fractal image of society as well.
Continue Reading - Click Here
Michael Tellinger
First Civilization on Earth Discovered in Southern Africa
Stone Circles
Scholars have told us that the first civilisation on Earth emerged in a land called Sumer some 6000 years ago. The persistent research by South Africans Michael Tellinger, Johan Heine and a team of leading scientists, over an extend seven-year period, has resulted in astonishing new archaeological and scientific discoveries.
Continue Reading
Continue Reading